As a group:
- Decide how you will be marking your texts up. How do you want to capture the details of how each text appears? What kinds of analysis and interpretation are you interested in? How will you capture the names of persons, places, organizations, &c.? How will you encode gendered or racialized terms and concepts? How will you represent images?
- Record the decisions you make in a shared document; this will be the beginning of your project’s editorial declaration. You will probably need to revise and refine your editorial declaration after you begin encoding, so plan to meet as a group at least once for that purpose. You will hand in your editorial declaration at the end of this assignment and part of your grade will depend on the thoughtfulness of your work. Guidelines are here.
- After your texts are encoded, decide how you want to publish your work. What aspects of your encoding do you want to highlight for your viewers? How do you want your texts to look when they are viewed online? How can the online versions of your texts highlight those aspects of the encoding you consider to be most significant?
On your own:
- Following the guidelines established by your group, encode a short text. Be particularly attentive to any tensions you note between the framework established by your project’s standards and the specifics of your own text.
- Use the “comment” function very liberally to explain the choices you make as you encode your text, to note complexities as described above, and to point out any information or analysis that you are not able to capture through markup alone. The comments are your best opportunity to demonstrate the thought that you put into encoding your text (and to make it clear that any potentially unusual aspects of your encoding are the result of deliberation), so please be as detailed as possible in commenting on the work that you do.
- Note one or more locations in The Tempest where your document could serve as a note/hyperlink to give contextual information to readers. Write a brief introductory note (no more than a paragraph) explaining to readers how your document is relevant to the passage. This introductory note should be written from an editorial perspective (not in the first person); think about the footnotes you see in our Norton edition and imagine your annotation operating in a similar fashion.
- Write a brief introduction to your encoded text (500 to 800 words). In this introduction, you can discuss the decisions you made in encoding your text, reflect on any significant aspects of the text you noticed as part of the encoding process (especially those that weren’t evident just on reading your text), and talk about any challenges you faced or any textual phenomena you weren’t able to represent through encoding. You will likely have addressed many of these issues directly in the comments of your encoded file, but this is your chance to unpack them in some greater detail and to offer more synthesized description of your encoded edition.
Send your materials by email by the end of the day on Friday, October 19th. These include:
- Your encoded TEI file, including your comments on the encoding decisions that you made
- The 500 to 800 word introduction to your text (as a Word file, PDF, or Google Doc)
- The note linking your document to the Tempest: with both the text of the note itself and an indication of which lines you are linking to your document (as a Word file, PDF, or Google Doc; you can combine the introduction and note, if that simplifies things)
- Your editorial declaration (as a Word file, PDF, or Google Doc)
- Either the custom.css file you want to use with your texts *or* your notes on how you want your texts to display online